“Pieter Hugo:This must be the place” at the Ludwig Museum, Budapest

943466_10151407005512016_1089844970_n

The show at the Ludwig Museum of South African photographer Pieter Hugo’s large, color photographs opens a window onto a side of Africa that few Western museum-goers are likely to have experienced, and it does so with an unflinching, documentary gaze that remains honest. His portraits emphasize the individual’s humanity. Through gaze, the viewer is connected to him or her, often people who they might be separated from by sociopolitical or economic factors.

51 58

Next to the portrait Ashleigh McLean, left, is Hugo himself, a young and successful white man in South Africa. His subjects are often not either of those things, and there is a tension there. More on that in this interview with the artist. Maybe that tension fed into this most recent portrait series, There’s a Place in Hell for Me and My Friends, where he alters his own and his friends’ skin pigmentation, subtly playing with our perception of them through their skin tones.

5066504ed9 d4d2efbc53

The two portraits above, from the “Permanent Error” series, are called Al Hasan Abukari and Aissah Salifu, named after their subjects. In this way, Hugo doesn’t allow the subject to be de-personalized, while posing them in traditional, statuesque ways and with a direct gaze. The two men are among many people who search through an expansive dump of obsolete technology in Ghana for scraps of precious metal. Overall, the exhibition at the Ludwig offers a documentary-esque yet aesthetic experience, which on one could be critiqued as exoticising the other, but I think Hugo escapes that with the personal connection and dignity he treats his subject with, even if never negating the voyeurism of portraiture.

More on the artist’s website.

Occupy Ludwig

321435_10200485264907466_1211884389_n

I haven’t shared information on Hungarian cultural politics in over amonth, but unfortunately not a result of an improved situation or stasis; I’ve just had a lot of deadlines. Since May 9, protestors have occupied the Ludwig Museum-Budapest’s stairwell, something The Art Newspaper published a story on a few days ago. It’s great to see international media pick up on this local activism directed at the lack of transparency in the government’s cultural decision-making, and specifically against the current most critical issue: the replacement of the current director of the museum, Barnabas Bencsik.

DSC_9278

Bencsik and Júlia Fabényi applied for the position, and an advisory committee recommended Fabényi to the government. Certainly to my mind, Bencsik is the much more qualified candidate. The protesters are also reacting to a series of political decisions that they feel have threatened the autonomy and professionalism of cultural institutions, and the group has stayed (and slept) in the museum for the past 11 days, and intends to stay until their demands for more information about the election of the new director of the Ludwig is met. From their press release:

9th May 2013

Unite for Contemporary Art                                           

We demand complete transparency in the running and adjudication of professional competitions in the art world!

The lack of transparency and culture of secrecy surrounding the current competition for the post of director of the Ludwig Museum – Museum of Contemporary Art Budapest is unacceptable!

The anti-democratic practices afflicting education and society in the last two years have now reached the art world, including: the merger of the Hungarian National Gallery and the Museum of Fine Arts without proper consultation with art professionals, the appointment of the director of the Műcsarnok / Kunsthalle without a competition, the unjustified elevation of the Hungarian Academy of Arts (MMA) to a position of institutional dominance holding sway over public funds, and most recently, the lack of transparency in the Ludwig Museum competition.

DSC_8462

The protesters have held many discussions and other events in the stairwell over the past week. Thursday evening, I attended a lecture by curator Kate Fowle on generative curating. Originally, she was going  to speak at the tranzit office about ICI (Independent Curators International)’s ongoing DO IT project with Hans Ulrich Obrist; however, given the situation the lecture was moved to the Ludwig stairwell and she spoke about reaction and revolution, and the changed role of the curator over the past 20 years with the rise, promise, and disillusionment offered by politically engaged biennials and institutional critique. Occupy as a movement and internationalism were discussed as problematic issues rather than easy solutions. I don’t know what the role of a curator is, or how an institutional critique could best be presented in Hungary today. But the Ludwig was considered the last autonomous art museum. And the protesters-mainly artists and art professionals- are offering a critique of their own.

197624_603766632966677_492318854_n

In terms of this particular story, however, there is perhaps good news. The government put off its final decision about the directorship for another month, suggesting that it is considering keeping Bencsik in the role. It announced this delay the day after Occupy moved into the stairwell, and a few days after the Ludwig Stiftung (the museum’s collection was founded by a donation from Peter and Irene Ludwig’s  Foundation) insisted on a meeting to discuss the directorship before the final decision was announced.

emptywhitecubegallery

This a positive sign, although I have no faith that the government will use the additional time to actually reconsider rather than prevaricate. And, in the interim,  this major institution will continue to flounder without any leadership–no one can be hired (and staff have begun to leave because of the changed circumstances) and no financial commitments can be made. Exhibition planning has ground to a halt as everyone waits. Bencsik’s contract expired at the end of February; now, the earliest possible date for a director is mid-June. It is a shocking waste of time, money, energy for everyone involved–in a truly non-partisan sense–for the government to continue to drag out this stupidity. At this rate I can foresee an empty museum, with no staff and no exhibitions in its galleries. If anything represents the loss and waste to the community, or more clearly exemplifies the damage to the credibility and professionalism of the institution, I think that image does.

A reverse-chronological series of posts about the cultural political situation in Hungary: