Stumbling upon a book of Jonh Donne’s poetry, reminded me of that great virtue of 17th C. poetry: reason.

Before the confessional angst of the Romantics, where feeling guides the pen and the poet is the amanuesis of higher sensibilities, poetry was dominated by the controlled and thoughtful poets such as John Donne. Donne’s style deigns the shimshammery of claiming ‘inspiration’ and ‘pure emotion’ guided your hand instead of thought, as it uses intellect to frame a complex argument. Reading Donne is like wrestling with an intellect as it takes you through the course of an argument until you end up somewhere quite different from where you started.

Lovers’ Infiniteness

If yet I have not all thy love,
Dear, I shall never have it all;
I cannot breathe one other sigh, to move,
Nor can intreat one other tear to fall;
And all my treasure, which should purchase thee—
Sighs, tears, and oaths, and letters—I have spent.
Yet no more can be due to me,
Than at the bargain made was meant;
If then thy gift of love were partial,
That some to me, some should to others fall,
Dear, I shall never have thee all.
Or if then thou gavest me all,
All was but all, which thou hadst then;
But if in thy heart, since, there be or shall
New love created be, by other men,
Which have their stocks entire, and can in tears,
In sighs, in oaths, and letters, outbid me,
This new love may beget new fears,
For this love was not vow’d by thee.
And yet it was, thy gift being general;
The ground, thy heart, is mine; whatever shall
Grow there, dear, I should have it all.
Yet I would not have all yet,
He that hath all can have no more;
And since my love doth every day admit
New growth, thou shouldst have new rewards in store;
Thou canst not every day give me thy heart,
If thou canst give it, then thou never gavest it;
Love’s riddles are, that though thy heart depart,
It stays at home, and thou with losing savest it;
But we will have a way more liberal,
Than changing hearts, to join them; so we shall
Be one, and one another’s all.