Indirect and Unsettling: “False Narratives” at Pierogi Gallery

Nadja Bournonville, A Collection of Small Grey Stones 2012, Analog C-Print, Edition #3/3 + 2 A.P., 29 x 23.25 inches

Nadja Bournonville, A Collection of Small Grey Stones, 2012. Analog C-Print, Edition #3/3 + 2 A.P., 29 x 23.25 inches.

A lady in a dress the color of a Madonnas, its rich folds of blue against the crumbling texture of a pale wall. Her hands clasped in a lady-like manner in her lap. Her tissue thin grey medical mask awkwardly covers the front of the face, where there should be sight. This photograph by Nadja Bournonville and its blinded subject opens the excellently strange group show “False Narratives” at Pierogi‘s new Lower East Side location, appropriately enough as it thematizes the potential for brokenness, puncture, and error beneath a deceptively smooth surface. Bournonville’s body of work takes the invention of hysteria as its subject matter, asserting that Dr. Jean-Martin Charcot largely created the disease with the technological aid of photography in the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital in Paris at the end of the 19th century. Bournonville represents the spectacle of this endeavor in poetic images of the anonymous female restrained by science and studies of playful pseudo-medical machines that recall the work of Eva Kotatkova.

Tavares Strachan, Dislocated remnants from simultaneous events, Providence, RI, (Broken windows diptych), 2010, Plexi-glass, glass, plastic, wood, metal, 34.5 x 39 x 6 inches each panel

Tavares Strachan, Dislocated remnants from simultaneous events, Providence, RI, (Broken windows diptych), 2010. Plexi-glass, glass, plastic, wood, metal, 34.5 x 39 x 6 inches each panel.

The detailed backstory, rooted in the imagined violence of another time and place, that underlies Bournonville’s photographs resembles the approach taken by Tavares Strachen in his pair of matching windows set into the gallery wall. Strachen’s duplicate white-framed windows were created with precise breaks and the gallery floor is littered with broken glass below. He modeled them on a specific window in a disused industrial building in Rhode Island. There, the artist actually replaced existing windows with matching broken ones. This discreet gesture for noone becomes immediately visible in the gallery space. Paradoxically, while the work becomes more clear, it also becomes less pertinent to the viewer, far removed from the original context. Yet the work takes on new meaning in the gallery space, accentuated by the title that refers to it as a diptych. Painting has long been credited with providing a view onto an imagined vista; here, the cracked glass presents only the gallery wall and the dim reflection of the peering viewer’s face.

Brian Conley, Decipherment of Linear X (X-Ca-Bc-006), 2004, Archival digital print, Edition 2 of 5, 20 x 13.5 inches

Brian Conley, Decipherment of Linear X (X-Ca-Bc-006), 2004. Archival digital print, Edition 2 of 5, 20 x 13.5 inches.

One can more easily draw a formal similarity between Bournanville’s photographs and the “Linear X” body of work by Brian Conley. Both present strong photographs in delicate palettes emphasizing texture and nuance. Both track down obscure paths with rigour: Bournanville, a historic medical and cultural phenomenon, while Conley applies his investigation of Linear X markings as if he were a scientist studying remnants of an ancient language rather than the stray markings of a beetle that he found on a stick in the woods. Conley’s work expands across the room with a glass vitrine featuring loose pages and a display of the artist’s book on the subject (which mimics a scientific volume), a corner of huddled sticks, and photographs and plaster molds along the walls. Conley’s premise, rooted in a known lie, is on one hand futile as a way of knowing the world and on the other creates an intriguing parallel universe.

Installation view of Brian Conley's work

Installation view of Brian Conley’s work

Roxy Paine, Meeting, 2016. Birch, maple, epoxy, apoxie, LED lights, acrylic light diffusers, enamel, lacquer, oil paint, damar varnish, paper, steel, aluminium, stainless steel; 130.25 x 97.5 x 58.5 inches

Roxy Paine, Meeting, 2016. Birch, maple, epoxy, apoxie, LED lights, acrylic light diffusers, enamel, lacquer, oil paint, damar varnish, paper, steel, aluminium, stainless steel; 130.25 x 97.5 x 58.5 inches.

Unlike these other works, rich in backstory, Roxy Paine’s diorama offers you no such guidance. Instead this fabulously constructed miniature beckons you from the far wall as you walk in, brightly lit as if by fluorescent light and featuring a prototypical American conference room. It brightness and skewed perspective to create the convincing illusion of scale hurt my eyes up close as I tried to mine its details to learn more. The scene is resolutely banal and rejects any narrative. Empty spaces maintain a psychological resonance when presented to a viewer looking in, or at least an air of expectancy. It highlights the dourness of industrial grade carpet, overpowering fluorescent lighting, stained ceiling tiles, the cold metal of folding chairs, and middling hot Folgers coffee, but to unclear purpose. By similarly indirect means as the other artists in the show, Paine tells a story, only his is seemingly without a plot or characters.

Nadja Bournonville, Medical Machines #5, 2012, Analog C-print, Ed. of 3, A.P. #1/2, 8.75 x 11 inches

Nadja Bournonville, Medical Machines #5, 2012. Analog C-print, Ed. of 3, A.P. #1/2, 8.75 x 11 inches.

Enigmas and ruptures smoothed over by a cool perfection make for a surprisingly cohesive summer show from the disparate group of artists. Catch it while you can. Pierogi has regular gallery hours through the end of July and then by appointment through August 12.

Abstraction or Representation? Macro or Micro?: Daniel Zeller at Pierogi

Detail of Fluctuational Placement, 2015

Detail of Fluctuational Placement, 2015

I want to start with the details: the tiny repetitive marks that constitute Daniel Zeller’s ink drawings line by quarter-inch line. This close-up look is absorbing, allowing one trace each stroke and follow the patterns that accumulate. It’s easy to imagine how the drawings evolved almost of their own accord, as one mark inevitably led to next. For me, to follow with my eyes the weave and expansion of these patterns was the central pleasure of the “Daniel Zeller: Immiscible Cohesion” exhibition at Pierogi Gallery.

IMG_7638

“Daniel Zeller: Immiscible Cohesion” exhibition at Pierogi Gallery

The exhibition consists of black ink drawings on paper in the first room, with a glimpse of a wooden structure in the room beyond. The gallery hung two earlier, colorful examples of Zeller’s work by the entryway, but I found the greyscale effect created by the black ink at a distance formed a cohesive show that steered the mind away from exuberance of form for its own sake and down the road of scientific imagery like cell slides and aerial topographical studies. The drawings often take an amorphous shape that stands out on the unmarked sheet around it to great effect. Just as the lines connect and flow out and into each other as if by some internally generated force, the overall effect suggests natural growths like mushrooms or tree trunks.

Daniel Zeller, Fluctuational Placement, 2015

Fluctuational Placement, 2015

Drawings such as Fluctational Placement looks roughly the same from a distance across the gallery, viewed as a whole from a few feet away (like the image above), and viewed from a few inches away (like the first detail image). Wherever one stands, it’s unclear whether such an image is more reminiscent of a black-and-white photograph taken from a plane or a peep down a microscope onto a bacteria colony. This vacillation between macro- or micro-view demands a constant mental readjustment as the viewer tries to make sense of it. Yet while the drawings are evocative of the real world, they remain in the realm of formal abstraction, another tension not meant to be resolved as much as considered.

IMG_7617

Inference, 2015

In the second gallery, Zeller’s sculpture Inference fills most of the room. The formal connections between the structured armature and connective fabric of the sculpture and the artist’s drawings are clear. However, Zeller’s drawings work well on a number of levels–as representations and as abstractions–and it is difficult to imagine whether this absurd object toes that line as well as they do, even if its shape recalls a bomb or submarine.

“Daniel Zeller: Immiscible Cohesion” is up at Pierogi Gallery in Williamsburg through November 17. Unfortunately, the drawings do not reproduce well online, so  I recommend going to see the exhibition in person if you are interested.